3:38pm
Good afternoon, Blog : )
Please, if you're not following the blog, hit the follow button on the side!
I must tell you all about my newest obsession. So, I am watching a Kdrama called I Am Not a Robot; it's very good! They are doing the thing that I hate, though - after everything gets good, the male lead's trust and ultimately, health, are put on the line, and the female lead decides to run away {insert 1 year later trope}. I personally have a high dislike for this one year later stuff, and as I stopped in the middle of an episode, am curious to learn what they do with it. Does she actually go to Australia for a year? I don't know - I hope not, but I don't know how else they could fill 6 hours . . .
However, as much as I like this new Kdrama and find myself wrapped in its world quite often, it is not my new obsession.
That is, my new obsession is the 2002 dark romantic comedy Secretary. Nothing can describe the hold this movie has on me, and the shamelessness with which I am thrilled to be enroped by its interest.
I must attach an article I have found and read, and consider to be 85% a good description of my thoughts on this movie. (SPOILERS INCLUDED)
In Defense of Secretary - by Fran Romanova; a victimless film; almost . . .
There are points in the article I do not agree with, but those are on matters of opinion.
I think the main one is this paragraph about Peter, a character I did not like.
"Some might say that Mr. Grey is cruel and abusive…well is Lee not on the same level as him? She is! And that’s why they are a match and I still like both of these characters. The way Lee has no regard for Peter’s feelings is not cute. The way she waits for him and expects him to understand that she doesn’t love him is vicious. To waste someone else’s time like that and play with their feelings is evil."
"I feel very sorry for Peter as a character. Justice for Peter."
Do I not agree with these sentiments, though? Yes, I do, and having been a victim myself of Peter's predicament, (at 15, though . . . not close to 30 . . .) I should understand, even be on Peter's side. But Peter has no regard for Lee. So I see no need why Lee should have any regard for him. She goes along with his dates, in my opinion, because she wants to seem normal, she thinks this will make her family happy, and she's NOT expecting herself to fall for Mr Grey and/or get entangled with him. Peter doesn't really care about what she wants, he gets in her space and makes her uncomfortable, and talks incessantly about getting married and having kids. He's not interested in Lee. The only time where I get the impression that he is interested in Lee or her feelings is at the very beginning of the movie, when he asks her if she's happy to be home - and then if she's "happy" to be home. After this, he is only interested in getting married, settling down, having kids - which is great! - but he doesn't want to do it with Lee, necessarily, he just chooses her because he knows her, she's what he considers to be a "safe" choice. The only other time I see him considering Lee at all is when he throws the condom off the bed after he misunderstands her desire to be spanked for wanting to have sex. However, as soon as she gives him permission, he jumps at the opportunity, even though she is clearly reluctant, and clearly not enjoying herself. Yes, in a normal world, Lee should have said something earlier, but this is Secretary, where the main leads are isolated, conflicted, and a little bit unstable. Do you think communication and decision and stepping on others toes are going to be prime considerations here? Highly unlikely . . . Peter is more stable and realistically should be able to see that Lee isn't interested in him. Why can't he? Because he can't even SEE LEE. All he sees is the woman of his future without even asking if she truly imagines herself in that future. That is my personal take . . .
Another thing I disagree with, which is entirely an opinion thing, is this paragraph about when she is at the desk. The author's opinion is that she is hallucinating, but I disagree. The author also claims that they believe the best person to visit her is a feminist that brings a stack of books. Why?? She can't read them . . . her dad and the priest at least read to her . . . here are those paragraphs:
"but I’ve always felt like in this scene Lee is hallucinating all of these people: these are just thoughts running in her starving-dehydrated mind. For example, her dad comes to read this very impactful quote. He basically gives her permission to finally move on, to not be attached to him anymore. She should live her life without worrying about him."
"Lee really wanted to hear it directly from her father. However the best character to visit Lee is a feminist who brings her a stack of books to read."
These are all matters of opinion, and at the end of the day, we have the same reasons for loving this movie, and I think it perfectly describes why. I wonder this article only has 14 likes?
Anyways, that is all for now. I'll be back when I have something interesting to say.
-SS




